I will be away for two weeks. Please try not to let Fannie or Freddie fail while I’m gone: I would hate to miss a big splash. And if MER, C, UBS and the rest can keep the writedowns under $10B each for a few weeks, that would be good too. But hey, I’m a [...]
Posted in:
Photography, Travel
by
David
/
Comments Off
Labour MPs are, of course, far more concerned for themselves than either the governance of the country or their party. Here’s just some of the utter nonsense, the self-serving anti democratic idiocy they and their leaders have been up to recently. Spending £3bn on new nuclear warheads despite not providing British troops in a war [...]
Posted in:
Nuclear Power, PFI, Political Metrics, Transport Policy
by
David
/
Comments Off
No, not a US rap act. But I do think that Fitch is not really pushing it in their new ratings model. According to Housing Wire: Fitch Ratings said Thursday that it had enhanced its U.S. residential mortgage loss model, called ResiLogic, a key component of the agency’s overall approach to assessing U.S. RMBS new-issue [...]
Posted in:
Mortgages, Securitisation and Tranching
by
David
/
Comments Off
This was my favourite blog title of the day: And now young monoline… you will die. Accrued Interest makes some good points, and indeed it must be frustrating trying to run a monoline when one’s de facto regulator, the ratings agencies, keep changing the capital model. However: It was clear that the capital models used [...]
Posted in:
Capital and Contingent Instruments, Monoline, Photography, Ratings, Regulation
by
David
/
Comments Off
Loath though I am to quote from a Murdoch publication – just look at the sad decline of the WSJ to see what being owned by him does to a paper – I do want to comment on something by Anatole Kaletsky yesterday. Fortunately it is an utterly wrong-headed piece which misunderstands fair value accounting. [...]
Posted in:
Accounting, Fair Value
by
David
/
Comments Off
Felix Rohatyn and Everett Ehrlich had some suggestions in the FT yesterday for how the bailout of the agencies (and the rest) might proceed. One option would be to design terms on which the Treasury would create “certificates” that would be swapped for conforming mortgage assets up to a predetermined percentage of banks’ capitalisation, together [...]
Posted in:
Markets, Mortgages, Photography
by
David
/
Comments Off
The WSJ reports that JP Morgan’s CEO is skeptical of the broker/dealer’s newly published capital ratios: “I challenge those numbers,” Mr. Dimon said, throwing a verbal roundhouse at rivals Goldman Sachs Group, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers. He went on to question whether the methods the investment banks used to calculate a measure [...]
Posted in:
Broker/dealers, Capital and Contingent Instruments, Regulation
by
David
/
Comments Off
A post on VoxEU discusses the debate between Larry Summers style ‘the FED must drop money on Wall Street until the problems end’ interventionists and the moral (and I believe broadly correct) position that banks ought to be left hanging to pay for their sins. Governments ought to be worried about their taxpayers, not bank [...]
Posted in:
Capital and Contingent Instruments, Moral Hazard, Regulation
by
David
/
Comments Off
FT alphaville is I fear too tough on some of the European Commission’s proposals to alter the Capital Requirements Directive. There is in fact much to like about the Commission’s original approach (if not its subsequent pirouettes). The key section of the original is: the originator credit institution shall calculate the risk-weighted exposure amounts … [...]
Posted in:
Basel, Capital and Contingent Instruments, Photography, Regulation, Securitisation and Tranching
by
David
/
Comments Off
Bloomberg points out: The [U.S.] debt limit is $9.815 trillion and the current outstanding public debt subject to that limit is about $9.4 trillion, according to the Treasury. In other words, actual US borrowing is within $415B of the maximum permitted by Congress. Now while more or less everything I know about the US budget [...]
Posted in:
Federal Agency, Markets, Ratings
by
David
/
Comments Off
The Economist points out something really cute about the GSE’s having access to the FED window: The Fed does not just accept any old assets as collateral; it wants assets that are “safe”. As well as Treasury bonds, it is willing to accept paper issued by “government-sponsored enterprises” (GSEs). But the two most prominent GSEs [...]
Posted in:
Federal Agency, Regulation
by
David
/
Comments Off
Naked shorting is wrong. To see why, consider a company with 1,000,000 shares, trading at $10: it has a market cap of $10M. If a hedge fund sells shares it does not own and does not borrow – a naked short – it creates new shares. Suppose it shorts 250K shares. Then there are 1.25M [...]
Posted in:
Markets
by
David
/
Comments Off
I had to travel via Heathrow today, so I went on the airport website to check the state of the public transport links to Terminal 5. It said `Service not available.’ And you can’t fault a short and wholly accurate summary like that. Please, Gordo, would you nationalise BAA — or shall I just give [...]
Posted in:
Transport Policy
by
David
/
Comments Off
A post on Accrued Interest concerning Fannie and Freddie caught my eye. Two quotes. First: delinquencies on their guarantee portfolio remain relatively small (0.81% for Freddie Mac and 1.22% for Fannie Mae)… And second Under current statues, the GSEs minimum capital required is 0.45% of of their guarantee portfolio So their current level of losses [...]
Posted in:
Capital and Contingent Instruments, Federal Agency, Regulation
by
David
/
2 Comments
From Reuters via a decidedly dubious post on FT alphaville (which signally fails the ask if the large European retail banks are hiding all the pain in accrual accounted books): the largest Spanish corporate default ever happened yesterday. Spanish property company Martinsa Fadesa said it would file for administration after it failed to raise funds [...]
Posted in:
Markets, Mortgages, Photography
by
David
/
Comments Off
You can tell you are in a bad market when all the old bull stories come out again. I remember in 2000 being told by a fervent believer in Lernout & Hauspie (RIP) how if a stock went down 2% a day and you bought every day on the way down until it had halved [...]
Posted in:
Markets
by
David
/
Comments Off
A question to anyone who knows _a lot_ about public sector accounting. Just how much help exactly can the U.S. provide to Fannie and Freddie before those $5T of mortgages consolidate onto the government balance sheet? And would the US still be AAA with another $5T of liabilities? Update. Bloomberg has caught up with this [...]
Posted in:
Accounting, Federal Agency, Ratings
by
David
/
Comments Off
Over the White House, that is. Willem Buiter is most entertaining on the GSE bailout: The financial assistance offered to US homeowners through the spagetti of federal financial inducements (ranging from the tax deductability of nominal interest payments to the subsidisation of mortgage financing provided by the FHA and the GSEs) is not primarily socialism [...]
Posted in:
Federal Agency, Photography
by
David
/
Comments Off
Some Friday illustrations. First the Markit ABX AAA 0702s, down again this week. And a heat map of foreclosures. Note the California and Nevada clusters are joining up, and Arizona is also a problem area – get not so much your kicks, but certainly your bargain properties on Route 66. Michigan isn’t going down as [...]
Posted in:
Markets, Mortgages
by
David
/
1 Comment
Calculated Risk has a post on Fannie and Freddie that defies belief. Commenting on the suggestion that the US government should bail out the agencies without screwing the stock holders – for instance by buying new sub debt to provide liquidity – they say: If this blog’s comment threads are any kind of representation of [...]
Posted in:
Federal Agency, Moral Hazard, Photography
by
David
/
Comments Off
Taken from CNN and Bloomberg, some tidbits on the GSEs: At the end of last year, Fannie alone had packaged and guaranteed about $2.8 trillion worth of mortgages, approximately 23% of all outstanding US mortgage debt. Egan Jones estimates that Freddie alone will need to raise $7 billion over the next two quarters due to [...]
Posted in:
Federal Agency, Writedown
by
David
/
Comments Off
The commission has bottled the capital treatment of securitisations. According to Bloomberg: European Union officials scaled back a plan to stiffen capital requirements for asset-backed bonds, responding to banking industry objections the measure would have hurt European lenders without reducing risk. The revised proposal, posted online last week, would let banks freely invest in securitizations [...]
Posted in:
Capital and Contingent Instruments, Regulation, Securitisation and Tranching
by
David
/
Comments Off
News flash: Bernanke has been speaking on consolidated supervision of US institutions. According to Bloomberg: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said Congress should give a single federal regulator enhanced power to set standards for the capital, liquidity and risk management of investment banks. (The emphasis is mine.)
Posted in:
Broker/dealers, Capital and Contingent Instruments, Regulation
by
David
/
Comments Off
CFO.com has an excellent post on Fair Value accounting. One quote in particular amused me: James Tisch, who was effectively the sole voice of dissent on the first panel, complained bitterly that fair value accounting required reams of nearly incomprehensible disclosure information and often forced his company to make poor economic choices. Tisch … said [...]
Posted in:
Accounting, Fair Value, Insurance and Actuarial Practice
by
David
/
2 Comments
A surprisingly not ill-informed and annoying article by George Monbiot (isn’t it nice when someone who is usually foolish says something sensible?) considers the good things about $140 oil. One of them is that it is stopping a lot of unsustainable fishing: No east Asian government was prepared to conserve the stocks of tuna; now [...]
Posted in:
Decision Making, Political Metrics, Transport Policy
by
David
/
Comments Off
Specifically they are down about 20% so far today, with Bloomberg reporting that they may need tens of billions more capital. The agency/treasury spread is over 200bps, and CDS on these (supposedly US government credit risk) firm’s sub debt are at around 180 over. The predicted chickens are coming home to roost. And we all [...]
Posted in:
Federal Agency, Markets
by
David
/
Comments Off
What do you call a Frenchman in sandals? Phillipe Phillop. With that out of the way, we can get to the point. Long or Short Capital, a good financial satire site, has an occasional series of Quotes Entirely Relevant to Investing. Well here’s one, an entirely serious one, from an excellent article by Julian Baggini: [...]
Posted in:
Markets, Organisational Culture
by
David
/
Comments Off
From FT alphaville:
Posted in:
ABS, Ratings
by
David
/
Comments Off
Having said that Basel 2 was only for the 20 largest banks, and that those firms had to use the most advanced methods in Basel 2, the FED has backtracked. It is suggesting that the standardized framework would be available for banks, bank holding companies, and savings associations not subject to the advanced approaches. This [...]
Posted in:
Basel, Regulation
by
David
/
Comments Off
Very. The FT quotes research by Meredith Whitney at Oppenheimer which suggests that since 2000, the volume of US mortgage lending financed by securitisations was seven times higher than the level funded on balance sheet. In 2005-07 alone, securitisations accounted for $2,500B of American mortgages, compared with $431B for on-balance-sheet loans. (I’m paraphrasing rather than [...]
Posted in:
Photography, Securitisation and Tranching
by
David
/
Comments Off