Last week Reuters reported that French Economy Minister Christine Lagarde said … that a capital surcharge was not a “panacea” for addressing the risk of systemically important banks, and she favored resolution mechanisms and tighter regulation In contrast yesterday it reported Financial Stability Board (FSB) chief Mario Draghi said there had been “unanimous” agreement among [...]
Posted in:
Capital and Contingent Instruments, Regulation
by
David
/
Comments Off
I didn’t catch this, but Jonathan Hopkin did. Julie Finch has the original suggestion in the Observer. Hopkin comments on her article high earners in Britain receive enormous tax relief on their private pensions, estimated by Richard Murphy to be worth £38 billion per year, about a quarter of the deficit. [Julie] suggests that ‘we [...]
Posted in:
Inflation, Insurance and Actuarial Practice, Pensions, Politics
by
David
/
1 Comment
Or, to be accurate, what does ‘worth’ really mean? Bloomberg has a story that at first glance seems to indicate a persistent lack of confidence in banks: Two years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., investors still aren’t willing to pay more than liquidation value for banks in developed nations. The KBW Bank [...]
Posted in:
Accounting, Markets
by
David
/
1 Comment
Repeat after me, dear reader, repo is about liquidity. Yves Smith fails to learn that lesson on Naked Capitalism. She comments on the crisis, saying that there was a fear that dealers would start accepting lower quality collateral for repos …And they did, with that collateral including complex securitized products that banks were obligingly creating… [...]
Posted in:
Liquidity and liquidity risk
by
David
/
2 Comments
Ken Livingstone has won the election to be Labour candidate for Mayor of London. Thank goodness. Ken actually believes in something. His opponent was a modern, what-do-the-electorate-want? polician, someone whose main claim to our attention was that she thought that she was more electable than Ken. The tendency for politicians to promote themselves not for [...]
Posted in:
Politics
by
David
/
2 Comments
Posted in:
Fun, Photography
by
David
/
Comments Off
“We need to … recognise, that in finance and economics, ill-designed policy is a more powerful force for harm than individual greed or error.” Adair Turner, Chairman of FSA.
Posted in:
Economic Theory, Rules
by
David
/
1 Comment
The Economics of Contempt has an interesting post on supervising large banks: First, significantly expand the dedicated supervisory teams for the dealer banks that qualify as Tier 1 FHCs. It’s not enough to have a 5-10 person supervisory team for dealer banks like JPMorgan, BofA-Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, etc… The supervisory team for each Tier [...]
Posted in:
Regulation, Risk Management
by
David
/
2 Comments
This article from FT alphaville is interesting – go there if you want the details of the arb. What it illustrates, though, is an important truism of the market: if you want to make a lot of money, find an arbitrage in a liquid market. Funky things in illiquid markets aren’t that interesting because you [...]
Posted in:
Liquidity and liquidity risk, Markets
by
David
/
Comments Off
… don’t believe them. There has already been a flurry of analysis: see for instance here, here or here. Those who thought that the international supervisory consensus might break (myself included) were proved wrong: the Accord continues. So why can’t the results be known yet? There are two main reasons. The first is that Basel [...]
Posted in:
Basel
by
David
/
Comments Off
A careless journalist says: If you’re a bank and the country you’re based in goes bust, then you’re going to go bust too. Nope. Or, more precisely, if a sovereign defaults on foreign currency debt, then banks incorporated in that country do not have to default on their foreign currency debt too, and even more [...]
Posted in:
Credit, Sovereign Default
by
David
/
Comments Off
Apologies for the dearth of posts, I have been away. As we all now know, the reality is: Tier 1 ratio 6% Capital conservation buffer 2.5% (to be met with common equity) Countercyclical capital buffer 2.5% (to be met with common equity) Common equity ratio 4.5% There are transition and grandfathering arrangements: commentary in the [...]
Posted in:
Basel
by
David
/
Comments Off
From Die Zeit: Tier 1 ratio 6% Capital conservation buffer 3% (of Tier 1) Countercyclical capital buffer 3% (of Tier 1) Core tier 1 ratio 5% Capital conservation buffer 2.5% (of core tier 1) Countercyclical capital buffer another 2.5% If this is true, you should think about selling bank stock and selling it now
Posted in:
Basel
by
David
/
2 Comments
It struck me over the weekend that there is a spectrum of views on the responsibilities of economists. At one end, you could claim that it is like mathematics: the economist announces the rules at the start of their work, and derives some results from those rules. As long as the results mathematically follow from [...]
Posted in:
Economic Theory
by
David
/
Comments Off
Let’s imagine a conversation between banker Bob and a regulator Reg. Reg: OK Bob. You screwed up big in 08. This time, I’m gonna make sure that your bank is safe. Damn safe. Bob: Very well, Reg, I see your point. But what exactly do you mean by safe? Reg: I mean that you have [...]
Posted in:
Basel, Capital and Contingent Instruments, Regulation
by
David
/
2 Comments
Rajiv Sethi is a clever guy and I have respected his work in the past, but I think that he is materially mistaken about naked CDS. In a recent paper with Yeon-Koo Che he writes: Those who are most pessimistic about the future prospects of the borrower will be inclined to buy naked protection, while [...]
Posted in:
CDS and Negative Basis
by
David
/
6 Comments